Do you have a mola that you suspect contains an errata? Join the Mola Collectors Forum to submit your photographs for community review.
This list is not a formal publication from a single source but a collective, evolving oral and written record of common manufacturing defects, pre-printed fabric errors, sewing machine glitches, and cultural missteps that define a "reject" or "second" in the mola trade. Understanding the Mola Errata List is essential for anyone buying, selling, or appraising these $50 to $5,000 textiles. The term “Errata List” (Latin for “list of errors”) was adapted by textile dealers in the 1980s to categorize flaws that disqualify a mola from being considered a “First Quality” or “Ceremonial Grade” piece. Unlike a machine-made product, a mola’s value is paradoxical: small human errors can increase worth (proving hand-made authenticity), while specific, large-scale errors can render a piece a "tourist mola" or fabric scrap. Mola Errata List
Furthermore, a new errata has been proposed for 2026: . With the rise of AI-generated mola patterns, any mola that perfectly matches a known, downloadable vector design with zero error is now considered a "fake errata." In a strange twist, the complete absence of human error on the Errata List now signifies a machine-made forgery. Conclusion: Embrace the Errata The Mola Errata List is not a shame document. It is a preservation tool. It teaches us that a perfect mola—no skipped stitches, no dye bleed, no cultural misstep—is statistically impossible unless it is a printed copy. Every authentic mola carries at least one entry from this list. Do you have a mola that you suspect contains an errata